In the current era we may begin to feel that we actually know a bit about the real-life people that we see in spanking websites - even 'though that is undoubtedly something of an illusion. It's probably because of the ease of producing videos that this has come about - it's clearly much more difficult to fake scenes when they're recorded on video than just captured with still photographs, especially when black and white photography predominated. As a result many - perhaps even most - of those we are seeing in newly produced materials actually enjoy the experience and probably carry it on in their private live as well. For someone who just wants to make some money, it's not that easy nowadays. We see punishments carried out that would, without question, be painful and we are critical where we see girls being punished too lightly. It clearly stands out as absolutely ridiculous if a girl is stripped naked, bent over and then just feebly tapped with a cane fifty or sixty times. If a girl is really punished in such a fashion you would expect to see very significant marking and clear distress, even if she does ultimately enjoy it in some way.
Of course there are exceptions. It's not very long ago that a model called Katie Spades claimed to be a lifestyle spankee only for it be revealed later that she hated it but just wanted to make money from it. Also some of the items coming from Eastern Europe in particular go much further than many of us might feel comfortable with and there has to be a clear inference that many of those who agree to be subjected to such brutal punishments are simply desperate to make money. This is inferred pretty strongly when you find a website out there calling itself Caned 4 Cash (now defunct). Nevertheless more and more spanking websites show behind the scenes clips showing the participants all really having a good time making the movie, and interview where the participants talk - apparently honestly - about how they feel and why they enjoy the scene. there are also more opportunities to take part in parties and suchlike and meet and interact with the girls you have seen on your computer screen
If you go back to the 1970-90's period it all seems rather different. There was really any feeling of connection withe the real life persona of the models, So who were these people? Some of them never even got a name attached to them. Very many appeared once in a magazine like Roue, Janus or the Blushes stable and were never seen again. One or two did do interview pieces but because these were just in print for, there was always a feeling that they were totally made up. Quite a number were clearly very young - in the 18-25 age band perhaps. More than a few looked a bit posh interestingly enough. Some were extremely attractive but perhaps lacked the qualities sought by the very demanding glamour market. Perhaps some of them were just needing to make a bit of extra money and if they couldn't make it from high-end glamour modelling, decided they preferred to take part in CP shoots rather than conventional sex scenes where they might be expected to have unprotected intercourse. Perhaps there were students who were struggling to exist on their grant (we had them in those days) and thought this was such a niche area that nobody was ever likely to find out. In many cases they might be required to wear outfits or accept nude scenes but rarely did the photographers in those days reveal too much. And because film and colour printing was expensive, many of the scenes were only recorded with a still camera and black and white was widely used so it wasn't to hard to fake some marking and not have to actually endure a painful experience. Over the next few weeks I'm going to feature some of these girls from Janus. Most - I think - only ever appeared in one issue. However I would love to know if anyone knows any more about the girls I'm going to feature, whether they ever appeared elsewhere, and whether we actually know anything about them.
To get the ball rolling...
Of course there are exceptions. It's not very long ago that a model called Katie Spades claimed to be a lifestyle spankee only for it be revealed later that she hated it but just wanted to make money from it. Also some of the items coming from Eastern Europe in particular go much further than many of us might feel comfortable with and there has to be a clear inference that many of those who agree to be subjected to such brutal punishments are simply desperate to make money. This is inferred pretty strongly when you find a website out there calling itself Caned 4 Cash (now defunct). Nevertheless more and more spanking websites show behind the scenes clips showing the participants all really having a good time making the movie, and interview where the participants talk - apparently honestly - about how they feel and why they enjoy the scene. there are also more opportunities to take part in parties and suchlike and meet and interact with the girls you have seen on your computer screen
If you go back to the 1970-90's period it all seems rather different. There was really any feeling of connection withe the real life persona of the models, So who were these people? Some of them never even got a name attached to them. Very many appeared once in a magazine like Roue, Janus or the Blushes stable and were never seen again. One or two did do interview pieces but because these were just in print for, there was always a feeling that they were totally made up. Quite a number were clearly very young - in the 18-25 age band perhaps. More than a few looked a bit posh interestingly enough. Some were extremely attractive but perhaps lacked the qualities sought by the very demanding glamour market. Perhaps some of them were just needing to make a bit of extra money and if they couldn't make it from high-end glamour modelling, decided they preferred to take part in CP shoots rather than conventional sex scenes where they might be expected to have unprotected intercourse. Perhaps there were students who were struggling to exist on their grant (we had them in those days) and thought this was such a niche area that nobody was ever likely to find out. In many cases they might be required to wear outfits or accept nude scenes but rarely did the photographers in those days reveal too much. And because film and colour printing was expensive, many of the scenes were only recorded with a still camera and black and white was widely used so it wasn't to hard to fake some marking and not have to actually endure a painful experience. Over the next few weeks I'm going to feature some of these girls from Janus. Most - I think - only ever appeared in one issue. However I would love to know if anyone knows any more about the girls I'm going to feature, whether they ever appeared elsewhere, and whether we actually know anything about them.
To get the ball rolling...
The first one is a girl I've featured before as a Favourite, From Janus 15 she enacted a photo story about a girl caught shoplifting who accepts a hand spanking and bare bottom caning rather than the police getting involved. They didn't even give her a name in the story. There were a lot of red marks on her bottom by the end of the caning (this was before Janus became nervous about showing marks) and they looked fairly credible, but were they just come clever fakery?
This young lady from Janus 18 was called Jennifer Simmonds for the story of a young liberal-minded student teacher accepting punishment from her headmaster in order to get a reference from him. Interesting use of very non-sexy clothing in this one.
Antonio du Bois is a strange case. She made a film called The Disciplinarian that Janus made out was one of the major CP movies of all time. It was good but perhaps not quite that good. In Janus 20 we were given not just production stills from the movie but a lot of extras and a back story of what had happened before the film. Strictly, she did appear again in Janus when she did one of their interview pieces but I don't recall ever seeing this posh totty ever doing another full shoot or another film.
And talking of posh totty, this delightful girl appeared in Janus 21 with the name Cynthia. She had a lovely bum and ended up with some good cane marks once more.




5 comments:
An interesting post James, and I look forward to seeing more in this series.
I have to agree with you about the videos that come from Russia and the other countries of eastern Europe. Alas, we are likely to see many more of those now that this misguided Government has decided to ban the streaming of home-made videos.(A classic example of the 'Law of Unintended Consequences' in action).
I bought my first spanking mags - Issue 3 of 'Kane', and an issue of 'Swish' - around 1980-81. I thought the 'Swish' mag was pretty poor, but 'Kane' was excellent. Both had photos of 'real', and really nice, female bottoms, but all of them were 'unmarked, I think because editors were nervous of showing cane marks on their models' bottoms.
'Kane' had hand-drawn pictures too and they showed plenty of marks, presumably because editors were more confident they would not be challenged. Sadly, Kane is no more, having finally succumbed to competition from the internet.
C'est la vie
Targetarear I can beat you...well not with a cane of course (such a disagreeable thought)but I was seeking out "flage mags" as they were often called back in the 60s. By the modern Eastern European stuff they were tame indeed but perhaps too much is actually taking the 'genre', if I may call it that, in a totally different direction.
Old Tom
Gilbert and Sullivan, said a Police man's lot, is not a happy one. But on this rare occasion of spanking a naughty women, on her bare bottom, it would be my pleasure, to deliver 'six of the best' with a cane, upon her naked rear end.
I so love that bare bottom caning (top photo) for shoplifting, Janus 15, James & I defer to your excellent knowledge of models & UK contexts in this post. She deserved her admonishment for that crime.
Oh my ! I sure remember that stingy-ass photo & story in Janus 15 when I saw it originally in the "mags shop" in Atlanta USA.
And for myself also (born 1959), that was my exact childhood punishment: cane to the bare botty !
Administered by my religious, God-fearing mother in the living room. Sister & me gotten to live in fear of having our bare backsides whipped "in front of God". Those whoopings were harmless & did us a whole bunch of good, James. Yes, we screamed the house down but it was just a fact of life.
We gotten spanked with love & due care & so when I gotten God-blessed with motherhood myself, in the mid 1980s, I then tanned my two daughters' bare backsides with that same, flexi-rattan switch in their childhoods, just like mommy did to me. Harsh but fair...a cane upon the bare.
As a student & then employee at that time, I so loved Janus & other UK mags in the late 1970s & early 80s, James. Plus our own NU West, naturally.
The domestic CP scenes were authentic & conveyed the drama & trauma of my own childhood whippings. Oh my ! Those early 1960s in Georgia gotten me hearing that phrase "spare the rod spoil the child" from my mom a whole bunch. And for sure, those strict, Southern Church moms said it to all their daughters in the hood already. And yes, I sure said it to my own girls too. Just par for the course, James - bare botties on show for a whooping !.
Brenda xx
Cane to bare botty, photo 1 - for shop lifting yes, but it' is also normal & necessary for all daughters' bad behaviour !
Oh my! Truly awesome post James, as always. I vividly recall this iconic visceral, authentic photo & the story in Janus 15....43 years' ago, James. It seems like yesterday ! Her red-raw-sore-botty reminds me of my naughty lil' sister having her undraped situpon tanned with mom's cane: mom sternly saying " a stinging bottom right now will stop you getting into trouble when you gotten older, young lady". How right mother was. And yes, my own botty looked just like that photo after mom's rattan rod had whistled across it's fairest-white, tender-skinned surface repeatedly for my misdeeds throughout the 1960s & 70s.
The girl's buttocks do look realistically chastised, James, perfectly aligning with the Janus editor's mantra (original, Ol' Janus Volumes mid to late 1970s) that naughty daughters should get a "sensible panties-down caning when they are naughty" at home. Well, yes, indeed, James: my own two daughters gotten exactly that over many years...that red striped bottom in the photo was a necessary & indeed regular feature in my house when I was a mother with two young girls. Cane to bare botty was the only punishment they gotten from yours truly !!!
For sure, this photo is potentially good to show young church moms who ask me about Southern discipline for their young daughters. It gets the message across, James (I call it cane to bare botty, that is my philosophy & practice), however the policeman looks "a bit weird", so it's not quite appropriate. However, as an alternative, your wonderful photo on your post, Monday, 23 March 2020, Pandemic, is perfect for illustrating my clear, strict guidance notes (as a grandma age 66) for moms raising naughty daughters at home !!!! YUP! Y'all invest in a lil' ultra whippy, thin, junior cane of the finest quality rattan !!
Oh my! In terms of one-offs, James, my all-time fave has to be Pippa Marshall who gotten her bare botty caned in Janus 23 (again, 1983, 42 years' ago. Oh my!!!!).
Back to the naughty thief above in Janus 15 - I vividly remember sharing this photo/article with my German friend, back in 1983, who I met at work, not long after this photo appeared in Janus. She is still my great bestie today. We share similar values on raising girls. She is older than me, & was raised in Germany in the 1950s, before emigrating to Atlanta (for her father's work). In childhood, she was punished with the traditional Rohrstock cane which most families kept as the botty smacker ! She gotten to kneel over the armchair, already, while her mother raised her skirt & pulled down her knickers for a whooping with the cane on her bare, white backside. That was the punishment. Period.
She told me that growing up in the 1950s, the Rohrstock was usually applied to the bare buttocks of naughty daughters in good homes, which was normal & extremely effective, & the canes were sold ubiquitously in the local stores.
She approved of this CP, as did I, of course. Oh my! This German CP of yore (sadly diminishing in the 1980s) was so similar to what I received as a lil' girl in the 1960s, and to what British girls gotten at home in the 1950s. 60s & 70s (as evidenced by Janus/Roue articles & letters) .
So yes, parents who care, cane on the bare, James, and now my young grand daughters' bottoms look like photo 1 when they misbehave. They have recently graduated to the cane (from the hairbrush) & yes, pretty bubble-gum pink panties are always pulled down so they fear & feel it on their denuded, tender, soft bots . I am merely an observer, James, but I strongly concur with my daughters' traditional "tough love", Southern views on discipline: CP good. PC bad !
Kind regards
Brenda xx
Post a Comment