This was another series of videos published by the sadly defunct Ravenhill Studios. While there were just six videos in the Beach Girls Spankings series and only four in Spankin' Down The Highway, there were no less than twenty-six videos under the RESOLVED By Corporal Punishment title. Again, the premise they wanted you to believe was that these girls were not actors, models or any kind of spanko, just ordinary American girl-next-door types who were willing to accept a spanking for financial gain. And again, as with the previous two series, they were to receive three bare-bottom punishments, usually for a timed five minutes, and the first of these was with the hand and the next two with implements chosen by Ravenhill.
However, whereas in the two previous series, the girls agreed to take a punishment purely for financial gain and the fun of being part of something a bit 'naughty', in this series, the concept was the girls had got themselves into a bit of a financial and legal mess. They got behind on rent or HP payments or something like that. The owner of the small business has threatened to take them to court. Now, the cost and time of a court case is unappealing to small businesses, so Ravenhill offers to pay in full of what the girls owe, if, in return, the girls agree to accept corporal punishment. Win-win. The business gets the money they're owed quickly and without wasting time in court, and the girls avoid getting a court judgment against them. The other difference from the previous two series is that, in some cases here, it's Tierre's sidekick, Richard Lewis, who gets to administer some of the punishments or their "Head of Security" called Reginald.
In all cases, the situation and the option are explained to the girls in question, and they are required to sign some kind of legal document. And then the punishments commence. I would say that the first two punishments are generally rather harder than those we have seen in the previous videos, and the girls' bottoms are marked more heavily. Sometimes, when the cane is used, it is a rather lighter punishment. There is a short interview with the girl afterwards where they generally say it hurt a lot but was better than going to court. Some reflect on how it compared to the punishments they had while growing up.
The videos are rather shorter than the other series discussed before - they usually each had two girls being punished and lasted around an hour. In this series, there is only one girl per video, even when two are jointly responsible, and each one's punishment makes a separate video of about thirty to forty-five minutes in duration. In number two in the series, Debbie gets her full three-part punishment while her accomplice, Trina, watches on, clearly enjoying it. She looks a bit less confident towards the end as her own punishment draws close, and she makes up number three in the series.
There are tears in several cases - in one, a girl is crying after just the first half-dozen or so hand-smacks - but most can manage a bit of a smile by the end. Presumably, the reactions said something about whether or not they had experienced corporal punishment while growing up.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
4 comments:
Nice.
Nice but There were a few attractive ladies The one in the polka dot dress and Trina in the first scene
The mind boggles as always, James. Thank you ! :-)
A tad bizarre, if most fascinating as usual.
Well, the girls do seem to be having fun, already ?!?
Which makes my redoubtable mother's maxim (from the 1960s) that a "stinging bottom is completely harmless" all the more correct !!!
I am laughing at ....well, the girl laughing on photo 4 (in her red t shirt). But I wager the other girl is not laughing as her bare bottom faces the cane. All cute n funny :-)
Mind you, this pink haired girl is STILL laughing even as her own bare bum is receiving the cane on photo 6.
I would not be so strictly maternal as to suggest another dose, James ha-ha! :-)
But alas, maybe her botty is fortunately God-blesssed with a hardy layer & tough-skinned covering of Rhino hide ??!
(unlike my tender own sadly !!)
I like the scolding on 10 & 11. A father/daughter context here it seems...I recall my own sentencing from papa, growing up in yore: AKA knickers down for the cane was the punishment rule. (although mom was the main botty-smacker-in-chief for my sister & me growing up in the 60s & 70s)
Bare bottoms caned ? Well, yes, great photos 14-18, were ergo, a familiar sight in our house....and in my nearby princess besties' houses too, way back in yore. CP was all just normal & indeed necessary.
Oh my! Yes, for sure, I always prefer the naughty "girls next door" approach. For sure ! As in real life, it is the girls next door who gotten their bottoms smacked hard !!! (Pray, one often heard it God darn it !)
Indeed, that was the maxim & context of Janus, originally in the mid 1970s, to the early/mid 1980s. But by the late 1980s, the girls featured were less " next door" and more glam-models, & so the whole CP context less authentic. The locations too were too glossy & salubrious - townhouses, & country ranches already. Not the authentic, plain, good Ol' living room or bedroom of the girl next door; and the routine, familiar protests, cries and wailing ....and then the resounding SMACKS of her bare buttocks being strapped or caned !
Par for the course, James. Par for the course !
Mucho thanks and kind regards as always, James.
Brenda xx
Number 14 is showing signs of 'overlap' where the tip of the cane has struck the sides of her right cheek. Very painful, I imagine.
Post a Comment