The Blogroll is now in three parts. The main part is arranged according to the date the blog was last updated with the most recent first. Many blogs use the BDSMLR platform which does not include date information; they are in a separate Blogroll arranged alphabetically but I check from time to time and remove any that have been permanently closed. The final part is a list of interesting Twitter feeds - again in alphabetical order.
Saturday, 2 February 2019
Favourite for February
Having commented in my previous post about how sexy tights/pantyhose can be I thought for this month's 'favourite' I'd follow up with an illustration of what a nice target a bottom so clad can present.
6 comments:
Targetarear
said...
Superb photo!
Tights/pantyhose worn over an otherwise bare bottom are a different 'take' on caning. They present a wonderful visual spectacle, the 'mesh' will intensify the sting of the cane, and because the fabric is semi-transparent when stretched in the bent-over position the caner can observe and admire his 'handiwork' while being able to judge and moderate the severity of his strokes.
I entirely agree. Tights or pantihose are an ideal frame for a naughty bottom to recieve a warm hand...or slipper...or cane...or. Well you know what I mean!
Interesting, James. Your posts are always interesting :-) Why, I sure do recognise the nasty cane, the skirt raised, the living room chair & the cut glass crystal, already! :-)
But I do not recognise the flimsy "protective coverings" cladding her seat of learning. Let me tell you James, when I gotten whoopings with the dreaded switch-cane as a child, my botty was very bare indeed! Oh my ! It was as tender-bare as the day I gotten born without debate or exception (which was early 1959). That was the sentence, justice & punishment.
The whippings stung like absolute crazy Hell...that was the idea, as my mother would duly inform me! Corporal punishment was not intended to be administered over fabric, protecting our soft, fairy-skinned botties. Oh no ! Knickers down was just an automatic ritual - not just for me & my lil' sis, but for y'all in the neighbourhood. For y'all in the State of Georgia !!
My mommy used to say that having our panties puled down was both strict & kind & necessary in the Christian tradition of not sparing the rod.
I strongly agree, James, & my own two young daughters (1980s born) naturally suffered the exact same uncomfortable fate (aka panties slipped down for chastisement) when they gotten that flexible, thin, rattan cane across their sensitive, white bottoms from myself for telling lies or bad attitude! No need for half-measures. It worked for us as as a typical, Southern family. Like mother, like daughter. Regards, Brenda xx
6 comments:
Superb photo!
Tights/pantyhose worn over an otherwise bare bottom are a different 'take' on caning. They present a wonderful visual spectacle, the 'mesh' will intensify the sting of the cane, and because the fabric is semi-transparent when stretched in the bent-over position the caner can observe and admire his 'handiwork' while being able to judge and moderate the severity of his strokes.
I wonder if the cane is because she has had a nip of dad's sherry or some other drink. See the glass on the table.
Old Tom
I entirely agree. Tights or pantihose are an ideal frame for a naughty bottom to recieve a warm hand...or slipper...or cane...or. Well you know what I mean!
Soooo glad the cane was banned by the time I got to school. Speaking from experience, tights definitely seem to keep the heat in
But Charlotte, it's never too late to find out what it might have felt like...
"Your backside needs a switching, Brenda!"
Interesting, James. Your posts are always interesting :-)
Why, I sure do recognise the nasty cane, the skirt raised, the living room chair & the cut glass crystal, already! :-)
But I do not recognise the flimsy "protective coverings" cladding her seat of learning. Let me tell you James, when I gotten whoopings with the dreaded switch-cane as a child, my botty was very bare indeed!
Oh my ! It was as tender-bare as the day I gotten born without debate or exception (which was early 1959). That was the sentence, justice & punishment.
The whippings stung like absolute crazy Hell...that was the idea, as my mother would duly inform me! Corporal punishment was not intended to be administered over fabric, protecting our soft, fairy-skinned botties. Oh no ! Knickers down was just an automatic ritual - not just for me & my lil' sis, but for y'all in the neighbourhood. For y'all in the State of Georgia !!
My mommy used to say that having our panties puled down was both strict & kind & necessary in the Christian tradition of not sparing the rod.
I strongly agree, James, & my own two young daughters (1980s born) naturally suffered the exact same uncomfortable fate (aka panties slipped down for chastisement) when they gotten that flexible, thin, rattan cane across their sensitive, white bottoms from myself for telling lies or bad attitude! No need for half-measures. It worked for us as as a typical, Southern family. Like mother, like daughter.
Regards,
Brenda xx
Post a Comment