The people making spanko movies don't work to high profit margins so they need to get things right first time. Often scenes are shot in a single take. A few are quite good at giving girls a break on request and then checking the continuity to make it appear seamless in the end result (Northern Spanking for example.) However, many want to make a virtue of the viewer watching the subjects' bottoms turn from pale creamy colour, to a pink blush and then to crimson red (and in some cases, beyond). If, after shooting it, you notice something got in the way you can't wait for the girl's bottoms to return to original colour and start again. Consequently, quite a few scenes that would become outtakes in conventional movies get to stay in. Here are some examples...
1. Often, as here, the problem is using one fixed camera and one moving camera and in the excitement of it all, the moving camera moves into shot. If the shot you need at that point comes from the fixed camera, you just have to include it and hope nobody notices (or cares).
4. This time the second camera has just managed to keep out of shot, but not out of line of the bright studio lighting, casting a shadow on the wall alongside him.
5. Similar to the last one; you have to think that sitting in front of the head getting a telling off and knowing you're probably going to get paddled very soon is bad enough without having a large camera lens moving in on your bottom as well.
6. If I'd just seen this as a still, I'd assume it was one of those "behind the scenes" shots that studios sometimes put out. But no, the guy who appears to be rather distractedly checking his still camera was in the final film.
9. I don't know if the sudden and unexpected reaction of the model to her pain was a factor, but someone appears very keen to get up close and personal with the microphone here.
2. Same again with this one.
 |
| 3. This second camera seems totally carried away - not only has he allowed his camera to wander in to the main shot, it looks as if he's about to join in. |
7. Back to the same film as in (1) above. You can make excuses where the second cameraman is on the wander, but really you do need to make sure your lighting rig isn't visible for your main static camera...
8. Because everyone just happens to keep a tripod and microphone in their living room...
10. Someone just didn't quite get out of shot in time.
11. Sometimes what seemed like a good hiding place is just not quite good enough. Unless that's a naughty schoolboy who's sneaked into the girl's gym to see what he can see and who's got more than he bargained for. Couldn't really blame him because it's a great little scene and well worth the risk of getting caught!
12. Rather unusually in this scene, it doesn't appear that the 'extra' is just getting carried away with what he's seeing and forgetting to keep off-camera. In fact, he doesn't seem too aware of what's happening at all...
13. And finally someone who really is engrossed. As a result he's as clear as any of the actors taking part and just as identifiable. Hope he hadn't ticked the box requesting anonymity...
Very frustratingly, I have seen what I have think was one of the greatest ever spanko bloopers, but can't find it now. I'm pretty sure the model was the lovely Catherine Corbet and it was probably from Spanking Online or another one of the Xerotics labels. She was bent over being punished on her lovely bottom when a mouse ran across the floor. Where did that clip go?
(credits to Broadband Spanking (1, 7, 13), AEG (2, 5, 8, 10), Xerotics (4, 11, 12), Ravenhill (3, 9) - not sure about number 6)
3 comments:
I believe I have never noticed such mistakes/outtakes but now the eagle eye of JS has pointed them out I shall have to spend hours watching such videos to see if I can. Sigh... well it must be done. Old Tom
Seen a couple of films with cats getting in the way
Photo 4: Cane to bare botty - normal, harmless & necessary treatment for naughty daughters at home.
Your eagle-eye & humour with the bloopers is heart warming, James :-)
I love photo 4 - very visceral for me (now age 63). When I was a naughty lil' girl in Atlanta, Georgia, back in the 1960s & 70s, I would end up (pun intended) like this girl: my skirt hoisted & my panties around my knees for a good whipping on my bare botty. Ditto for my younger sister. Likewise, the dreaded botty smacker, fetched from the cupboard, was a quality, whippy-thin rattan cane that mom purchased for our bare buttocks to keep her young daughters in line! Who needs namby-pamby half-measures, James ?
The new arrival cane was identical to that shown in photo 4, albeit much thinner...like a switch. We did not bend over a desk, but we bent over the sofa in the living room (or alternatively over our beds, jammies down to knees, botties bare, in the evening) The hornets nest sting was Hell on earth!!!...that was the idea of a "spanking", as mom charmingly called it.
Oh my! Such harsh, Spartan chastisement for daughters was unanimously supported in our Christian church & community. Why, yes, it felt like we gotten a kettle of boiling water poured over the sensitive skin of our bare botties....but yet, our neighbours, church ministers, teachers & other moms n pops all approved, already!! Y'all God darn advocated it, James !!!! Bare bottom discipline was just an essential foundation stone of family life & societal mores. Naughty steps were not invented ...good thing too! Lessons gotten learned with proper punishment.
My religious, kind, redoubtable mother recommended the cane to other moms at church (new-joiners) to use on their daughters' bare backsides, although the Southern strap/leather belt (in its various leather guises) was more common as a rule. My young girlfriend besties were nervous to attend our church coffee mornings at our house in the 1960s...because my mom might show their moms the cane that she used on my bare bottom...and so give the moms ideas on appropriate domestic discipline! Oh dear! Oh my! Ha-ha, there was no escape...
Fast forward to the 1980s: and I was God blessed with my own two wonderful daughters. My mother then kindly handed me down my own childhood cane to use on their bare bottoms when they were naughty. I sure was super strict with my girls, & my mom was often around with childcare duties to administer whoopings if they misbehaved. The naughty step or wishy-washy time outs never featured in our house, just knickers pulled down for the rattan rod every time. That was the rule & indeed, best practice in my view! No need to chastise through panties, dresses or pyjamas either. Clear the decks and on sensitive bare skin feel it!!! And it sure worked, same as for me growing up in the 60s! All swell now, my girls are pro-spanking & now & in their late 30s.
Thanks a bunch James
Brenda xx
Post a Comment