My favourite for this month featured a young lady getting an OTK spanking but with the twist that she's been hoisted totally off the ground and probably feels especially vulnerable. I got an almost immediate response from my regular fan/critic Old Tom that there was nothing wrong with a much more conventional and stable OTK position. I do like a bit of variety sometimes but in general I would have to agree. The more I've thought about it, the more - in my mind anyway - there's almost invariably one optimum position for any given instrument. If I'd decided to correct a young lady by using a particular implement, I guess 95% of the time I would expect to use the type of position I've indicated below. I wonder to what extent others agree with my choices?
HAND SPANKING

HAND SPANKING
Yes, I'd go for a most traditional OTK position, ideally on a good substantial leather sofa almost every time.
HAIRBRUSH
Replacing the hand with a hairbrush, my only adjustment would be to make sure there was better support than for the hand spanking because the hairbrush can hurt a lot and it may be necessary to restrain the subject from trying to wriggle away.
BELT
Using a standard belt or strap (e.g. the type manufactured with the purpose of holding your trousers up) you probably want to get a bit more swing than is realistic with the girl across your lap but you want her bottom to be well supported so she can't move it away from the implement. I'd consider a number of options here but ideally there should be a bit of a bend so the back of a sofa, the arm of a chair or face down on the bed with a pillow strategically placed to lift her bottom up a bit would be my ideal.
SLIPPER

If we're talking about an actual slipper or flip-flop for example in the domestic environment, then I'd probably take an approach similar to that for the belt above. However, if you read around credible accounts of life in UK schools in, say, the 1950's and 1960's, "the slipper" was widely used as the name for what was actually a plimsoll/gymshoe. I'm going to write a longer piece on this instrument soon because it's clear that it was widely used, in particular for less official punishments. While many different teachers seem to have drawn on the widespread availability of such items in a school and the fact that their presence was less a cause for alert than the sight of cane hanging up, it would hardly be surprising that the most frequent user of such implement would be the PE or games staff. As such, it's absolutely ideal fro the girl to be bent over some convenient piece of sports equipment such as a vaulting horse.
LIGHT TO MODERATE CANINGS
If the girl in question is fortunate enough to be able to adopt the classic "touch your toes" position then it seems eminently suitable for a good swift caning, with legs straight and together As well as probably being very uncomfortable there is also the risk of falling forward or coming out of position and therefore the threat of extra strokes if that should happen can only add to the girl's misery and enhance the impression of the experience.
HARDER CANINGS
![]() |
| Courtesy of Firm Hand |
If you're going to give a really hard or longer caning, or the girl is a bit older and less flexible, I think you have to be realistic and have her bend across a desk or chair although she should still have legs straight and together. Clearly she might still incur extra penalties, for example by standing up, but there's not much point in setting up a situation where she never has any chance of staying in place long enough for you to complete the punishment.
THE TAWSE (OFTEN REFERRED TO AS 'THE BELT' IN SCHOOLS)
![]() |
| Courtesy of Xerotics |
Of course the tawse can be applied across the bottom just as the cane could be applied across the hands, but to me it always seems more sensible to stick to caning the bottom and tawsing the hands. I know that when the cane was used in UK schools, especially on girls, it was often across the hands but it always seemed a rather risky process. I made that comment to a friend of mine who happens to provide services as a mistress and she immediately demonstrated to me that she could cane my hands safely and effectively (ouch!). However, choose the tawse, and I'd expect the girl to hold her hands out in front of her, one on top of the other as pictured here and half way through to change the hands over.
THE PADDLE
![]() |
| Courtesy of RealSpankings |
Moving across the pond to the US and the land of the wooden paddle, I don't think it's realistic for the girl to have to bend over with her legs straight and together and not supported by a chair or desk - there's a lot more momentum than with the cane and there's no point in knocking her off her feet with each blow.
THE BIRCH
![]() |
| Courtesy of MOOD Pictures |
Moving up to judicial punishment such as the birch, I think it is almost essential that the girl is secured in place. Properly applied it is going to be intensely painful and it's essential for basic safety as well as being able to complete the punishment that the recipient has minimum scope for movement.
Okay that's a quick roundup of my view of optimum position for each of the more common instruments - anyone have any different views?







3 comments:
Oh dear! "Critic," I hope not. I love your blog James so any comments of disagreement are not criticism. Imagine me instead disagreeing, over a pint of course, with your choice for England captain. Not at all hard I should imagine. Anyway this latest compilation wins my very form approval. Many thanks. Old Tom
I wasn't being negative with the use of the word "critic" - always up for a friendly discussion of differences over a pint. Only problem would be that if we ever met over a pint or three I suspect it could become a long session!
Yes, I love that classroom caning: number 5, "Light to moderate canings" - skirt up, knickers down, on the tender-fair, bare bottom, exactly as it should be for naughty daughters in the home, if not in the classroom !!
I find the context so realistic (if not the actual classroom already) & very akin to my childhood spankings at home with the cane from mother...that is: routine-normal, harsh, simple, no-wishy-washy-nonsense and... firmly on my bare botty !
For sure, every whipping I ever gotten in my childhood was on my bare bum. And nothing unusual about that in our Church community. "Your bottoms gotten bared for bath times & spankings ", as mommy used to say.
This photo so reminds me of my younger sister getting whipped on bare skin with the flexible rattan botty-smacker ("the hornets nest") that mom kept in the cupboard...even though it regularly took place in our living room in Atlanta way back in the 1960s. Why is that ?
Well, I always found your British Janus-style magazines to offer such realistic domestic punishment contexts - especially bare bottom canings with father/daughter or mother/daughter scenes (plus of course, classroom scenarios already).
I discovered these magazines as a student in the 1970s - I was fascinated & compelled. The realistic CP scenes were not contrived, or overly-theatrical, or pornographic, or embellished already. The seemed just like my spontaneous whoopings growing up in a strict, religious home in Georgia. This photo sure fits the bill, James. OK, Atlanta is more sunny ha-ha, & our living room sure looked different...but the CP context holds true, for myself at least.
As young bratlets, sister & me gotten spanked in private, in the living room, "in front of God". Mommy fetched the cane, down came two lil' pairs of shorts, down came two lil' pairs of soft-cotton, white panties and two chubby, bare alabaster-white botties gotten well reddened with the "switch". We screamed loudly. But spankings were totally harmless...and much needed.
Mom then pulled up our panties back up over our sore-hiney-red-skins, pulled up our shorts & then sent her two admonished daughters to their rooms...dancing, rubbing and crying profusely like babies. That was the punishment. I raised my two girls (1980s born) exactly the same way, tanning their bare backsides with that salutary rattan cane when required. It was just normal loving discipline back then, James. No naughty steps required !!!
The rule today in our non-PC, Spanker-land, Southern USA, is that clothed bottoms gotten spanked in the classroom (if applicable)...and unclothed bottoms gotten spanked at home (...very applicable !). Oh my ! And it has always gotten to be that way in my considerable, long experience as a strict, loving, "traditional" mother - & having been born in 1959 & strictly raised myself in a religious, staunchly-CP-focused family.
Great post James, thank you kindly, Sir !
Regards,
Brenda xx
Post a Comment