I've talked recently about wanting to see the reason for punishment as well as the punishment itself - well allowing yourself to be exposed like this not only, in my judgement, is deserving of a thoroughly good hiding, but usefully highlights that, with her skirt flipped back, she won't have much in the way of protection. I would think a hairbrush applied vigorously to the seat of her tights/pantyhose (delete according to which side of the pond you're on) would give her something to remember for the future so that we don't see any repeat of this outrageous behaviour. Or maybe we could borrow the belt from the young man that she's clinging to and make him watch?
12 comments:
I fail to see why she should be allowed to retain her tights (or pantyhose if you are in the US. Although they will provide almost no protection she has behaved with shameless immodesty so get them off.
Old Tom
Maybe the young man might enjoy applying the belt himself, rather than watch. Summary justice!
I hate to disagree with you Targetarear but I am not at all sure he deserves such an honour. From the photograph he is actually exacerbating the problem of her short skirt by the way he is lifting her up. I cannot believe he is unaware of the problem, so far from giving him such a task, perhaps he too should taste the belt.
Old Tom
I have to disagree with all of you.
It looks like they are together.
It should be up to him to give her the belt if he feels it is needed.
Though, I do not see anything really wrong with her attire and for the few seconds she is in his arms in the hug, she isn't behaving very outrageously.
She wore the clothes keeping in mind that her dress would ride up occasionally at the club during energetic dancing and such. So, she is keeping everything covered. She is dressed quite modestly for the club scene and her and his age.
Just my opinion
amber
Amber, unlike the world of political correctness the spanking world values and accepts everyone's opinions.
Have a good Christmas
Old Tom
Hi Amber - nice to have you here and commenting. I do agree with Old Tom that we're talking of things in Spanko World here and, in real life, if I saw someone whack her in a non-consensual manner I would be outraged but while my head is in Spanko World I rather like the idea of her getting a taste of a good leather belt across her scantily protected behind whether she likes it or not. I'm a little surprised that you think it would alright for her boyfriend to do it "if he feels it is needed" - if they happened to have a spanking oriented relationship then it might provide a handy excuse for a scene but if not then she's not his property to treat roughly.
Ah, I wrote quickly and worded it a little ambiguously.
I meant that "if anyone" should be whacking her, it ought to be the boyfriend. Which it appears they are that relationship.
And yeah, I did leave out "if they were in a relationship that allowed for him to do so" . A lot of times what I write is a continuation of thought that I do not always include. I also have been known to butcher the language as well.
Good thing I teach math and not english eh?
amber
oops I hit send too early.
I meant to say just like in the previous post, I don't "really" think public caning for eating a fruit is justifiable. It would be a horrible place to live where it would, but I did not think to add that to my comment.
Good job schools are now closed for the holidays isn't it Amber?
Merry Christmas
Old Tom
So, Amber, is public caning for more serious crimes acceptable? Not arguing... just asking.
Old Tom
It would free up our over crowded jails. A public caning and wear a sign saying " I am thieve" or I sold drugs. I am deadbeat dad/mom . I never understood putting them in jail for not paying support. How are they going to pay in jail?
Harsh but fair ?
Great observations of everyday life, as always James - I am a realist not a fantasist. Maybe you're being a bit harsh on this girl, already ?! I would let it go. And I say that as a strict, loving mother to two girls who gotten raised with corporal punishment. I did not spare the rod!
I believe in harsh but fair discipline. And so do my daughters (now mid 30s) & they are pro-spanking. They thank me for my tough love approach to parenting, back in their 1980s/90s childhoods. Oh my!
This photo & behaviour I am fairly relaxed about, although I preferred my girls to dress conservatively.
In their younger years, if they told lies or fought each other or had bad attitude, punishment was fast & furious: CANE to BARE BOTTY !
Without reprieve of compromise, James. I considered it simply good parenting. There was no wishy-washy chastisement. And the panties up or down debate sure did not exist in our house. No Sir!! As naughty lil' ones, yes, they really feared the cane (that was the idea)...but in truth, only because I always bared their bottoms! It's the only way to do it. Period.
Born 1959, I had gotten myself raised in a strict, conservative, Christian family & my own mother was then in turn, on hand to discipline my daughters a bunch with the cane, just like she had whooped me (aka soundly on a bare botty). This allowed me to work hard as a career woman in a big corporation in Atlanta. My hubby did not spank my girls - that was my sole role.
And I believe that plenty of strict bare bottom whooping in their early, tender princess years, meant that they had gotten into good habits in their teen years. Oh my!
And I vividly remember my mother often telling my lil' sister & me (through our tears, with our hands on our heads) in the early 1960s, that "a stinging bottom right now, will stop you getting into trouble when you gotten older, my girls!" as we stared petrified at the thin rattan cane, on the sofa, and felt the waistbands of our 1950s, cotton, white knickers going South to our knees. Botties on show !! Same for my daughters. We are just a typical Southern family already, James.
Spankings are just a fact of growing up.
Regards & thanks.
Brenda xx
Post a Comment