We talk often enough about requiring someone to "bend over" for a punishment but I must admit I also like to see someone "bending in". It's a reaction not seen nearly often enough in my view although these examples show that it is not entirely neglected by some of the main producers of CP material.
It seems an entirely natural reaction to having just received a tremendously painful whack on the butt to "bend in" as well as clutching at the affected area both to try to rub away some of the sting and, I assume, to psychologically move the target as far as is reasonably possible from the next blow. It has a futility about it as the movement is not going to really prevent further punishment - in fact if the punishment was continued on the back of the recipient's hands it would undoubtedly hurt even more and with the hands safely taken away, presumably being "bent in" like this would make it more difficult to move as the next blow landed and so could again make it hurt more. Nonetheless it does appear to be a natural defence reaction and in each of these cases, although photographed for professional CP publishers, the actual movement looks to be a fairly genuine pose.
2 comments:
Another excellent article and quite right. I have seen kids at school react like that when 'flicked' (not at all light)with a cane and girls, whether professional models or not, are no different to schoolboys. It can also happen when someone suspects they will be smacked. They put their hands on their bottom and bend in.
Old Tom
Like boiling water scalding your bare botty !
That is exactly how it should feel, already. I sure remember the trauma, James, with my mommy's chastisements. That is me in that lovely, vintage, second photo. Getting spanked by mom in front of God in our living room in 1960s Atlanta. Oh my !
My 1950s white cotton panties are correctly positioned, James. And do you like my pretty, Southern Belle dress ? This photo sure is quite realistic, already !!
Just two difference in my childhood punishments: first, the "botty smacker" for sister & me was an ultra-flexible, thin, rattan cane (applied to our bare buttocks) and we never once gotten the paddle. Nor the strap, either, James. It was just mainly the cane in our house. Plus the wooden spoon & hairbrush briefly in the early years.
Second, sister & me gotten caned over our mother's knee or bending over the sofa in the living room. Or bending over our beds. We never gotten to touch our toes. So it was more about "leaning over", James, rather than "leaning in." Oh my !
My mother would flick the thin, rattan switch across our bare botties & let it "dance" repeatedly for far too long (!!) across the sensitive, lily white skin ...to create the boiling water effect!! Oh my ! We called the cane the "hornets nest".
As a mother, I used the exact same "flick & dance of the cane" technique with my own two young daughters in the 80s/90s. Oh my ! Out came my trusty, lil' "botty smacker" (quality rattan cane) & down came two lil' pairs of cotton panties amidst tears & protests. I consider that normal strict parenting. As a mom, my maxim was don't spare the bare. I never once caned their protected, clothed bottoms James. Not with my religious faith, traditional beliefs or strict Southern values. Whoopings need to be feared & felt !
And they sure were. And I am reliably informed that my girls tender, white backsides have since recovered: they are long left home, now in their mid-30s !
Regards,
Brenda xx
Post a Comment