I recently came across a video of a rather nice little spanking scene. Attractive young girl taken over the knee by her male companions and hand spanked - firstly on the seat of her skirt, then on her panties and then on her bare bottom. The bottom ends up transitioning from pink to very red and doubtless quite sore, and then he consoles her. Little doubt that, in the context of the video, her spanking is entirely justified and appropriate. However, it just seems a little unfair to me that her spanker gets his face pixelated out so that he can't be recognised and she doesn't - I think I'd be pretty confident that anyone knowing the girl might not have seen her in this position before, but they'd be sure to recognise her.
4 comments:
Great to see you back, James!
Love the sequence of the pics here. We just need one more - bare with a hairbrush!!
Tiredny
Hi James, I recognize that bottom. So pleased it is not pixelated!?
What is definitely not unfair, James, is naughty lil' princess brats receiving a good, Ol' fashioned, over the knee, panties down, bare bottom spanking & caning when their attitude needs adjusting. It is simply par for the course. Or as the wise Janus editors of the mid 1970s regularly said: naughty girls should be punished with a "sensible, knickers down caning at home."
Thanks & spanks
Good Spartan Brenda xx
I wonder if a video exists of this cute scene?
There is a video titled Sore Loser that was produced by Spanking Soulmate. It used to be on SpankingTube but not now and I can't see it anywhere else.
Post a Comment