I do appreciate that many readers of this blog want to see bare bottoms but I know I'm not alone in enjoying more realistic scenes as well. This scene must have happened so many times in schools in Scotland, parts of the Midlands, and North East England in particular. Love some of the attention to detail such as the way the girl is slightly hunched as if bracing herself for what she knows is going to be a very painful experience in a few short moments. Perhaps she's been told off during class and then told to stay back at the end so she's had a lot of time to think about what was to come. Alternatively, perhaps the rest of her class are sat behind her watching - glad it's not them this time.
5 comments:
Having experienced the cane on my hands many times as a junior at primary school I strongly disapprove of hitting hands. The bottom, bare or not, is far safer. OK so I am a spoil sport but it's my opinion.
Old Tom
I would never approve of the cane being used on hands - I think the tawse is a good deal safer and it's widespread use in that way - especially in Scotland - would seem to back that up.
We used to get rulers on hand in primary school.. i'm not sure it was the safest either, but hey, no one was seriously hurt - physically anyway. Our egos all took a good beating tho.
I disapprove of corporal punishment at school... but i love the tawse (my old spanker-partner offered an Scottish one to me seven years ago, and I still venerate it like a relic) ! More on my bottom than on my hands, ouch !
Lesson are best learned over a bare bottom...not bare hands!
Yes, bare bottoms for me, James. Because that was reality. I am talking about spanking at home, naturally, not school. My own bare bottom & my sister's featured a lot when we gotten my mother angry back in Atlanta in the early 1960s. Any yes, my own (now grown up) two young daughters' bare bottoms likewise featured when normal Southern traditional tickle-tail was required from yours truly back in the day. I kept the flexible, switchy-cane in the cupboard & two lil' pairs of panties had to come down. No snowflake, naughty step nonsense required, James. That was the punishment.
Yes, you are always correct: bare bottoms at school is pure fantasy James (IMHO). Too many stories of non-truisms. CP in schools, where present in some American Sates, is given over clothes, obviously. But at home bare bottom punishment is common. When I gotten God-blessed with my own daughters in the 1980s, I believe that 80% of people supported spanking at home in the USA. And when I gotten raised myself in Georgia in the 1960s, the percentage in support may have gotten even higher among us religious folk !!
My mother used to say with her strong Christian tenets, that school was for learning & homes were for spanking. She was surprisingly not keen on spanking at school. It was a mother's duty of care at home, James !! I share her views.
I understand that 60% still support CP at home, in the USA today, James. My life seems to have gotten full of fellow, typical Southern moms of all ages, talking about smacked bottoms - at Church, at Bible Classes, at cheerleading club & sports, in the mall, in the park and at coffee mornings !! As a child, the most frequent phrase I ever heard was "spare the rod, spoil the child." Our elderly, pious neighbours said it a bunch to my mother & father! So did the Church ministers. It was scary, already, James, but just normal for y'all. Just part of growing up. Europe makes such a darn fuss on this issue!
Spanking hands is a NO! NO! for me, James. It is "dangerous" & abusive & no need for it, again, IMHO. Our dear Lord provided us with a far better place for routine, safe, kind chastisement !!
My sister & me realised at an early age (across mom's knee) that we gotten blessed with the softest, fairest, chubby botties in Atlanta. Very well-padded & abundantly covered in the most-sensitive of fairy-tender, alabaster-white skin, which minus protective coverings (knickers duly pulled down by mom!) provided a very suitable, safe & effective surface area upon which appropriate, stern, loving maternal chastisement gotten administered with a lil' whippy-thin rattan cane...or in other friends' houses, they gotten the straps, paddles, hairbrushes etc. We sure were all cute lil' deers with the bears behind :-)
My own two girls, now in their 30s, are part of the 60% James and are strongly in favour of CP at home. They ruefully know from their childhoods, that a lil' rattan cane applied to their bare backsides by their exasperated mom, was part of normal care & discipline in our family, as typical conservative, church-attending traditional folk.
We are a normal, Southern family, James. My Hubby chose not to spank our girls & so I gotten to be the botty-smacker-in-chief. I always chastised them on bare skin with that lil' switch, James. Yes, it was real stingy, red-sore but harmless, already. That was the rule. And of course, only ever on the sensitive skin on their bare bottoms (provided for that very purpose), & never on their loving hands. Same as I gotten as a lil' girl back in days of yore. All fine & swell, James.
Regards,
Brenda xx
Post a Comment