Guide to this blog

The Blogroll is now in three parts. The main part is arranged according to the date the blog was last updated with the most recent first. Many blogs use the BDSMLR platform which does not include date information; they are in a separate Blogroll arranged alphabetically but I check from time to time and remove any that have been permanently closed. The final part is a list of interesting Twitter feeds - again in alphabetical order.

Thursday, 1 June 2017

Favourite for June

What is there not to like - young girl, gorgeous bum, and obvious apprehension as she tries to see what is in his hands.  I suspect it is likely to be a belt...

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

All that picture needs is a back story.
Old Tom

Anonymous said...

It was not a belt James, but a thin rattan cane aka the "switch" - and it was in my mother's hand. This is me receiving a spanking from my mom back in Atlanta in the 1960s. A common event ! Just a normal fact of life - I gotten my bare buttocks whipped with the switch. Bending over the sofa in the living room. And the Church folk advocated it already !

I love your Blog. Just discovered it.

I gotten raised in a 1950s strict, conservative, religious house and my mother kept the "rod of correction" in the cupboard ...for my bare botty ! And for my younger sister's bare botty too already. No wishy-washy nonsense for us Southern girls.

When we were naughty, we gotten sent to the living room. Mom fetched the cane , our panties gotten pulled down and we gotten a whooping on bare skin. Then we gotten sent to our rooms.

Baring our bottoms was just normal. No big deal. That was the punishment. And I raised my own two daughters exactly the same in the 1980s/90s. A stinging backside taught you lessons and stopped you getting into trouble when older...and panties logically always gotten pulled down so the cane ("switch") would sting on sensitive bare skin proper. Period !

Corporal punishment on a bare ass was just part of growing up, James. There was no PC snowflakes, time-outs or naughty steps. Not like everywhere today, especially UK and Europe. I am nearly age 60 and my daughters are early 30s - their fairest-skinned backsides have recovered already, and they are married and successful !
Thank you.
Brenda xx

James Stephenson said...

Glad to bring back some happy memories Brenda and thanks for happening by and commenting. I guess my blog tends a bit towards a UK bias for obvious reasons but I'm happy to note that across the pond there persists more of a belief that there are perils in sparing the rod (or hand, or paddle, or switch or....)

Anonymous said...

Thank you James- Oh my ! I could write thousands of words on this. Where to start ?!

This great, realistic photo here of (me !!) this fairest bottomed naughty girl awaiting a spanking from her mother so reminds me of my long-held beliefs, instilled by my own mother when I was a child in a strict, religious family in those early 1960s - "that God had blessed me and my sister with a special soft, chubby, well-padded place, covered in plenty of the fairest, most sensitive skin and upon which a mother's strict, loving chastisement would be sternly administered (on bare skin naturally) when we misbehaved". I sure believe that still today at age 60 James.

My mom's "rod" of choice was the whippy, thin cane. Harmless was ferocious on a bare bum. That was the idea. Oh my ! Yes, I disciplined my own two girl exactly the same strict, Southern way throughout their childhoods. I always bared their bottoms - it's the only way to do it. They sure feared and felt my flexible, lil' spanky-stick, James. Maximum sting, maximum safety. And appropriate humbling. Very little PC in the 1980s/90s.

PC has increased over decades but spanking is common in the US, especially in the South, as you know. Integrated into social mores and family values.
Being a strict, loving mom is respected. And when I was bad as a lil' princess growing up, out came the rattan cane, and down came my 1950s white, cotton panties. Botties on show for a whooping. Period.
My girlfriends in our Church group gotten similar punishments too. As we recollect today already.
It is just normal family life, James ! No Snowflakes fuss in Georgia. Oh my !
Same now as it ever was.
Regards
Brenda xx

Anonymous said...

Bring back the cane !

No bottoms gotten harmed in the raising of daughters and granddaughters.

So James, seven years and counting: bring back the cane !
I am referring to the cane for the bare bottoms of naughty girls at home in the UK, James. We already gotten the cane & CP a bunch in the US !!

Indeed, close to home, this wonderful photo reminds me (viscerally) of my recent observations of my young granddaughters getting their bottoms smacked by mom for fighting. Yes, absolutely with the cane. And yes, absolutely with their bottoms (un) "protected" exactly the same as shown in this authentic, stark photo: Oh dear, ergo: 100% bare-naked & denuded !!! Alas, no protection for naughty bottoms necessary. No wishy-washy nonsense.

This was my first post above, on your truly wonderful, unique site, almost 7 years' ago James, Dec 2019.

Wot no RUFF - TUFF - SKINNED botties to lessen the cane ?

No fear ! So looking at this wonderful photo of the "orthodox spanking surface" once again, James, I am even more acutely aware of the distinct, absolute, complete & utter absence of any thick, ruff-tough, resilient, hardened rhino-hide skin covering its tender, round surface area. Boo-Hoo! The fairest, cotton-sensitive, padded, skin is so fairy-soft, squishy -white and ultra-tender which makes it (in its naked state) such a perfect target for loving chastisement, and for a nasty, firm, short sharp visit from mom's whippy, thin, rattan cane which alas, mom has now fetched from the cupboard. Harmless Hell indeed is the "hornets nest", James.

My daughters like to use some of the phrases I said to them when they gotten whooped in the 1980s & 90s.

" A stinging botty now will stop you getting into trouble when you gotten older !

How to sting ? Well, first the panties are pulled down, of course, to expose the tender skin. And second a quality cane is firmly applied. Notice the sound. Notice the naughty girl's response. Notice the STING .....and yes, I notice the rapid improvement of my granddaughters' attitude & behaviour over the next days, weeks, months. For the duration !

Oh my! Indeed, this photo confirms once more, that my "cane to bare botty " advice to other church moms is well received & heeded, James. I do readings, gospel work, community advice at church. I will be 67 in the New Year and so moms might confide in me & tell me about their impossible, badly behaved, bratty, young daughters. Those poor hardworking mothers !

Oh my! What to do ? Well, the same as it ever was : position Lil' Miss Miscreant kneeling, & bent over the armchair, (or the sofa as shown here) turning up their dresses, turning down their cotton panties to knees and applying a finest-quality, thin, flexible rattan cane firmly & repeteadly to her bare buttocks as necessary is my only recommendation James.....and has been since the 1980s. So yes, cane to bare botty - repeat as necessary over the years. The past is different country for their daughters. The moms are so thankful too !

Those Janus editors were Oh so correct in 1979, James: an Editorial, Volume 9 number 12. Naughty daughters at home definitely need a "sensible, knickers down caning", also then described as "a good bare bottom caning" and also called a "panties down caning" . All three descriptions/quotes appeared in one succinct paragraph for parental guidance, James. My beliefs , philosophy & practice are totally aligned. I gotten raised that exact same way in the 1960s & 70s.
Oh my! Here's to another seven years of commenting...
Thanks & kind regards
Brenda xx