There's a lot of anger around, quite rightly in my opinion, about the recent changes in UK legislation trying to curtail certain types of kinky videos from being distributed on the internet. It mostly seems misguided, vindictive, unjustified and stupid.
Okay at the first level it's a nice photo of an attractive young girl semi-nude in the outdoors. It's not clear to me whether this is a professional shoot or not - she does have a lovely face and legs and one of the nicest bottoms I've seen for some time, but if it is a pro-shoot they've wanted it to look less posed so the denim jacket and hoodie aren't very much in keeping with a traditional glamour shoot. It could just be one lucky guy with a girlfriend who has been prepared to partially strip off, hoping nobody comes along, and has allowed him to photograph her. She certainly looks a bit coy and even embarrassed like she wouldn't be making a habit of doing this, but maybe she's just good at posing such expressions.
What different guys, stumbling around the web, trying to find something stimulating are looking for next may be any number of things - I'll tell you for now I'm not going to give you a definitive answer here because I haven't seen any more images in the set if, indeed, there ever was a set.
I'm sure there are many who would like to find a full sequence with her starting out fully dressed, removing a few layers to get to this stage, and then probably a few more until she's fully nude. What are they going to look for next? Many will clearly be hoping for it to go further.
Do they want to see her fingering herself, licking her tits and rolling around on the autumn leaves?
Do they want to see the boyfriend stepping in front of the camera so that she can get down on her knees to get him warmed up with a blow-job before she turns on to all fours so that he can really screw her hard from behind?
Do they, instead, want to see another girl coming into the scene and deciding to join our young friend's solo orgy?
Perhaps they want to see her being caught by an older man - the farmer or landowner - who offers not to report her in return for her giving him what he wants?
Funnily enough, I'd bet that more than 90% of readers of this blog went down a different route altogether, started thinking about that plentiful supply of switches all around and hoping the direction of travel is more like this...
However, fortunately, no government is likely to ever be able to put legislative controls on our imagination, and that is a wonderful thing because the same source material can provide pleasure to different people in different ways. Take this rather lovely image...
What different guys, stumbling around the web, trying to find something stimulating are looking for next may be any number of things - I'll tell you for now I'm not going to give you a definitive answer here because I haven't seen any more images in the set if, indeed, there ever was a set.
I'm sure there are many who would like to find a full sequence with her starting out fully dressed, removing a few layers to get to this stage, and then probably a few more until she's fully nude. What are they going to look for next? Many will clearly be hoping for it to go further.
Do they want to see her fingering herself, licking her tits and rolling around on the autumn leaves?
Do they want to see the boyfriend stepping in front of the camera so that she can get down on her knees to get him warmed up with a blow-job before she turns on to all fours so that he can really screw her hard from behind?
Do they, instead, want to see another girl coming into the scene and deciding to join our young friend's solo orgy?
Perhaps they want to see her being caught by an older man - the farmer or landowner - who offers not to report her in return for her giving him what he wants?
Funnily enough, I'd bet that more than 90% of readers of this blog went down a different route altogether, started thinking about that plentiful supply of switches all around and hoping the direction of travel is more like this...
5 comments:
I don't know about 90% but you're right about my imagination. You have also touched on something I believe. Less is more when it comes to photographs. Some people may need to see every little detail portrayed but that is because they are lacking imagination. A little hint, a gentle nudge and the imagination can run riot and even stay within the law.
Old Tom
I've just been reading that Pandora Blake's Dreams of Spanking is to be investigated by the League of Purity or whatever they are calling themselves. How odd it is. When I was a boy being a homosexual was illegal and Gay men or women were referred to with utter contempt or disgust. My mother was open in her condemnation of "fairies" or "queers". Spanking however, was as common as muck and at every stage of education until I was 16 I was subject to corporal punishment. It was little better at home and at a friend's I have even seen a girl (his sister)being punished with a riding crop. Now that is reversed. To be Gay is legal and open but spanking...! How long I wonder before the police start hunting down spanking between consenting adults. Will visiting Americans be banned from giving birthday spankings? How peculiar these modern puritans are.
Old Tom
I hope the sting of this pliable switch upon this naughty lady's knickers down bare bottom, was truly a painful one. For when a gentlemen uses such a corporal punishment implement, it must have been a serious error she committed.
I have had the pleasure of birching a naughty female's bare bottom. It a delight when that swish descends upon her bare bottom. Sexually it puts me into heaven.
Gonna get a switchin'!
Another brilliant post, James. Yes, a well-smacked bottom for this girl, James, with knickers pulled down of course, or minus knicks as is the case here. The bare seat of learning is the orthodox surface, provided by God. The lovely drawing of papa with his switch is definitely the solution to this dilemma! I say this as a Southern belle (OK, I am 63, already ha-ha!) and a mother of two wonderful daughters (now mid/late 30s) who gotten raised with a whole bunch of corporal punishment in the 1960s, along with my sister. This was both normal & necessary in my opinion, James.
I am no wokerati supporter of the naughty step (I still agree to disagree with some PC moms who are my fiends) & so this girl needs a good whooping on her bare, soft, squishy-white botty (perfectly unprotected and tender as shown, James) My 1960s childhood was loving traditional & strict in Atlanta. My God-fearing, kind, Christian mother soon gotten a spanking stick for her two daughters - a top quality piece of rattan cane. Very thin & very flexible. Her mantra "spare the rod spoil the child" was repeated at every turn - and the church moms said the same all the time. Quire right too!
Throughout my childhood & teens, from age 7 nearly 8, I graduated from a wooden spoon & gotten this much-feared botty smacker countless times when I was naughty - dress hoisted & my 1950s, cotton, white panties were pulled down every time without exception so that I could feel it on bare, sensitive skin. It was ferocious but completely harmless. And yes, most necessary. For sister & me all chastisements were harsh & Spartan and on our bare botties. It sure made sense. We thought nothing of it - that was simply how it gotten done. Panties down ensured max sting, max safety & a good, moderation of humbling (but never humiliation)
Oh my! When I was God-blessed with my own two daughters in the 1980s, James, my mother gave me this same spanking stick for their discipline (indeed she was mostly around to administer it with her child care duties. I was working at a big corp) Why yes, for sure, my girls gotten it good n sound on their bare buttocks, just like their mom! And yes, I sure had no argument with seat of their knickers, just their unprotected, bare backsides for that salutary cane, James. No fear! And no silly naughty steps were needed. We are just a normal, church attending Southern family.
This girl is al fresco. Oh my! And while the sight & sound of a cane hitting a bare backside was familiar to me (a fact of family life, frankly), I never actually gotten spanked outside. This is surprising. I also did not spank my daughters outside. But in the 1960s, I saw plenty of my besties have their bare bums whooped in the park or mall, store or in their own homes.
In the 1960s & 70s, I was always excited to see my African American friends have their pretty dresses spontaneously raised & their lil' cotton panties duly put down to their knees for a good, hard bare botty smacking from their wonderful, super-hero moms. And then moreover, with the belt sternly across a bare ass at home, more like! Spankings were perhaps even more prevalent in the African American community & is something of a separate fascination for me over many years - and something less covered in the media & literature, already.
So yes, my great mother & I were both of the opinion that panties can be pulled down at home in private for good, proper, loving spanking (with the cane in our family) In fact, they must always be pulled down!! Whereas a spanking in public was not of our choosing - although I was always mesmerized to watch them over years in Georgia, of course.
Great post, James. thank you.
Brenda xx
Post a Comment