This one has been sitting around for a while in a folder I use for potential "favourites" - not sure if it's from a professional studio or not since it doesn't really fit the style of any of the major players.
In fact there are several things that make it a bit unusual - the way she's leaning towards the desk for starters. The punishment is clearly about to start and it appears that her backside is to be the target even 'though she is still, at present, benefitting from the relatively generous protection of a denim skirt. The skirt does show her curves quite nicely and it's short enough that it wouldn't be especially difficult to raise it to really make the punishment more effective (and you have to guess that will happen before very long). We can't see the implement to be used but it's to be hoped that it's something fairly solid like a wooden hairbrush which will be quite capable of making her bottom sting even with this much protection.
I think the thing that I like most about the picture is the girl's legs - we don't get nearly enough pictures where the girl isn't actually undressed but shows so much of her lovely legs as we get here thanks to the ankle socks. In fact, if I was in his position, the first thing she would get would be a shower of solid smacks to the lower half of her legs - when I was little, this was not an uncommon way to punish (sometimes called a 'whizzing' which I rather like) because it was guaranteed to really sting and also to leave unmistakable and embarrassing red fingermarks for everyone to see.
I think the thing that I like most about the picture is the girl's legs - we don't get nearly enough pictures where the girl isn't actually undressed but shows so much of her lovely legs as we get here thanks to the ankle socks. In fact, if I was in his position, the first thing she would get would be a shower of solid smacks to the lower half of her legs - when I was little, this was not an uncommon way to punish (sometimes called a 'whizzing' which I rather like) because it was guaranteed to really sting and also to leave unmistakable and embarrassing red fingermarks for everyone to see.
10 comments:
It looks to me that the man at the left of the picture is undoing his trouser belt. Perfect for reddening such a cute bottom.
I agree with your comment about her legs. and the skirt.
Oh I like this! I like the sweet, demure attitude yet with the anticipation of some chastisement.
I agree with al your comments about the girl and the setting...both quite delightful. However, I read the photo slightly differently. To me the man appears to be undoing his belt, presumably to use on her bottom, and she is in the reluctant process of bending over the desk. It leaves tantalising questions of course. Will her skirt be lifted? Does the skirt need to be lifted or being so short will be ineffective anyway?
Will her knickers come down? How many will he give her? Who is he? What has she done? Oh dear, so many questions and so little by way of answer; I need a stiff drink.
Old Tom
It is all rather tantalising isn't it?
Lucky girl :)
And I know it's naughty, but I for one love having the back of my legs smacked. So wonderfully humiliating and stingy... it makes me feel anything but a grown woman.
I would be happy to oblige Penelope!
Old Tom
Do you like having your bottom smacked too Penelope? Not being nosey, you understand. Just curious.
Hi James,
You and I obviously have similar tastes! You kindly said some nice things about a Janus story I wrote many years ago called 'Justice Seen To Be Done'... Now you are waxing lyrical about a photo I took a few years ago. I have more in the set if you are interested. Also that photo has been cropped by somebody else - the implement was either tawse or cane, I'd have to check.
Tony N
Tony - I'd be fascinated to see more from the set - this is the only one from it that I have and she's very cute (and it wasn't me that cropped it I promise!)
Skirt up panties down, James ?
Or panties down, skirt up ?
Oh my! "Hands on head" either way already "young lady!" to start the bottom baring process.
I can tell you from vast experience James as a Christian-raised girl & strict mother (I gotten born 1959) that a flexible, thin, high quality piece of rattan cane smacking across that thick, comfy, denim skirt & under-panties will not sting a bunch! But a "baker's dozen" with that quality whippy cane on a bare botty, knickers around knees, stings like merry Hell on earth. That should be the normal punishment, at home. Cane to bare bottom is utterly harmless, but oh so effective & salutary when needed (as my two daughters can ruefully verify).
So yup! Naturally, all whoopings for me & my sister with the cane from mother in the 1960s & 70s were on our bare bums. I can remember no exceptions. Mom never spanked through panties or other coverings, only on bare skin. And she nearly always used the rattan-cane. A few moments of unmitigated Hell taught us not to tell lies or misbehave from a young age.
Corporal punishment was severe but harmless, & most learned!!
Whizzing ?! Fascinating, James. I had not heard it named that, already. Yes, in Atlanta's outdoor climate I saw a bunch of leg smacking taking place when we besties AKA the girls in our Church community gotten together with the Christian mothers in the park...and also indoors in the mall, the stores & the famous 1960s coffee mornings (often hosted in our house, by our mom, who was senior in the Church) Oh my! First, I never gotten a whizzing on my legs, myself. And second I never gotten my bottom spanked in public, James.
All chastisements for me & lil' sister from mom were on the bare botty, with the cane ("the switch"), and at home formally, in private in the living room, "in front of God" in the Christian approved fashion. Surprisingly, mom did not like to punish us in public, which meant we sometimes had to leave an event or shopping trip early, to be taken home for the cane. Oh my!
But the sound of another daughter's legs being smacked in the park was common, but moreover, the sound of a hard maternal hand or even a hairbrush pulled from a designer-purse, on a bare, soft, porcelain-white backside was even more normal!
A furious mom would take her naughty lil' one aside: up came a pretty, lil' 1950s canary yellow dress; down came a a pair of matching canary yellow or dazzling white, 1950s, cotton panties...and a pudgy, pale, bare botty gotten a sound tanning. Chastised princess screams & cries gotten ignored. It was all so routine & normal. I always strongly approved (despite my own whoopings with the "hornets nest"at home) at a very young age James!! I was keen to observe these spankings. In fairness, we all were obsessed with smacked bottoms, simply because it was a fact of life for y'all!
I do love this photo James, and your writing. My own two daughters gotten corporal punishment from an early age (1980s/90s). I cannot abide wishy-washy nonsense, so when they were naughty, I fetched the cane, two pairs of panties came down & two sensitive, bare seats gotten just desserts. Yes it was real harsh, but totally harmless - a few moments of remedial Hell did them good, like I gotten as a child. No naughty steps required.
Oh my! CP was just good Ol' fashioned parenting, & it worked for us as a family. My girls are now in their thirties, already,and are fully pro-spanking. Most of their besties/peers gotten spanked growing up. PC is still a minority sport in Georgia today, James, & spanking was so dominant & normal in families when I was raising my girls. The Church strongly advocated "the rod" on bare bottoms at home, same as for me in the 1960s. That was how y'all gotten it, good n sound!
Thank you & regards,
Brenda xx
Post a Comment