There are a significant number of cases where we find images on the internet of girls getting their backsides spanked, strapped or caned and then the next thing we see them clutching, holding or rubbing their bottom to try to lessen the pain.
I think this is just plain wrong and needs to be seriously discouraged. I appreciate that it may be an almost instinctive reaction and may actually achieve very little of what is intended.
However, the point is that the intention is quite clearly to lessen the pain and provide some degree of comfort and that in itself is totally at odds with what is intended by the person giving the punishment. Putting it simply, spanking is meant to hurt, and not just for the duration of the punishment itself but for some time afterwards.
Rest assured that any young lady going over my knee and having her bottom spanked will still be feeling the stinging some not inconsiderable time afterwards and that is every bit as much a part of the punishment as the scorching while it's actually happening.
On one level, rubbing her bottom to ease the discomfort is extremely disrespectful to the spanker who has given his time and effort into delivering the punishment which she is now trying to negate. Looking at it another way, it can be seen as a form of cheating - the person administering the punishment has made the decision of how long and hard to spank with the explicit expectation of it continuing to sting for some time afterwards and she is trying to circumvent that. It is really no different to if she had tried to wear an extra pair of knickers or lied to try to get her punishment reduced.
Any of those methods of cheating would almost certainly warrant additional punishment - quite rightly - and trying to cheat by rubbing her bottom shouldn't be treated as any less serious.
I would suggest that any girl who is having her bottom spanked for misbehaviour, should be made fully aware that when the spanking ends she is required to stand against the wall, lie face down on the bed, stand to attention while being rebuked or whatever. Furthermore it must be made clear that if she is so unwise as to clutch or rub her bottom it will be regarded as an attempt to thwart a significant part of the punishment and will result in further meaures being taken.
That further punishment could be anything up to and including the possibility of the whole punishment being carried out again from the beginning so that her punisher can be sure that she gets to experience the full duration of the aftermath of the punishment without any comforting.
I suspect that few girl would ever make such a mistake twice in the case.
6 comments:
The purpose of ANY punishment is to change behaviour. If that isn't the purpose it is no longer punishment but something else altogether. In the case of spanking one may spank for sexual gratification but in the case of the young that would become abuse so it can only legitimately be to correct and change behaviour. Punishment should end and reconciliation follow. Banning a natural impulse such as rubbing can easily become cruelty and an abuse of power. Would we ban crying which is also a natural response to being spanked? Well even if we could that would become an even greater abuse of our power to chastise. Let the punishment end with the last stroke, swat, smack or whatever then it is time for forgiveness and reconcilaition.
Old Tom
I WOULD BE PLEASED IF A GIRL RUBBED HER BACKSIDE AFTER I HAD SPANKED HER. A SIGN THAT I HAD DONE A GOOD JOB. LET HER RUB AND CRY
I Allow my spankee to rub her bottom after the spanking. but wont i dont allow is when she trys to rub her bottom during the spanking. i see this as a sign of resitence, eg putting her hands in the way ect.
when she does, i stand her up and give her a few sharp strokes with the strap on each hand then resume the otk hairbrush spanking! she learns by this method strict but it works!
I prefer to do the rubbing myself rather than letting my spankees do it.
The redhead second from the top looks like she deserved a spanking with her short skirt, bare legs and sulky attitude.
Last photo: Father is real cross: cane to bare botty !
Why that lovely last photo is me & my father in 1960s Atlanta, James ! Sister and told me told lies, so out came the trusty, dreaded cane ("the switch") & down came our 1950s, cotton, white panties for a whuppin'. No hesitation or reprieve: corporal punishment was firm & normal. It was just good, routine parenting in my parents' eyes. In or Church community's eyes. And in my eyes too, James.
I did not rub my poor, smacked botty as shown. Not until I gotten sent to my room after I had gotten my panties pulled back up & my skirt smartened back down. Our whoopings were formal with brief but structured formats & procedures. Scolding & the knickers-down routine were scary, effective, distinct punishments in their own right (exactly the same for my own two daughters James, later in the 1980s/90s)
Every spanking we very gotten was on our bare buttocks, from the first to the last. Mainly from mother and mainly with the cane. In our early years, very early 1960s, the wooden spoon & hairbrush featured for lil' sis ...and then our bare, whiter-than-white, fairy-soft botties soon gotten graduated, upgraded & sentenced to the flexible, thin, rattan cane in the tradition of stern, religious, Christian doctrine of "the rod" !!
Oh dear :-(
I raised my own two young daughters exactly the same: cane to bare bottoms. I never once left their knickers in situ over the years. I always pulled them down to knees for spankings with the same switchy-cane.
Bare botty is the only way for me as a conservative, Christian-raised, loving, strict purist when it related to parental CP for my own girls. They are now long left home, happy in their mid 30s...and pro-spanking !!
No PC, wishy-washy, snowflake wokeness existed in Georgia the 1980s/90s James. Not much now today either on spanking, Thank the Lord. I was a fair, hardworking, loving mom...but I sure did not suffer wishy-washy discipline. Moreover my hubby did not spank our girls. I respected his decision. So I gotten to be the "big meany bad cop mommy" in charge of smacking bottoms. Oh my!
For sure, a nasty stingy lil' cane applied to the fairest, sensitive bare skin on the chubby, well-padded place provided by God (for loving chastisement) soon gotten me two very sorry, compliant lil' angels after a few flicks. Same for me as a naughty child. And the "hornet's nest" flicks kept going !! I did not spare the rod. Well-smacked bottoms prevailed from a young age from the get-go, James. Like mother like daughter. Or in this photo, father & daughter!
Thanks you as always for your efforts & wonderful Blog. At age 61, already, I do feel your fine curating is part (not just of my memories)...but viscerally part of my actual memoirs !!! Oh my!!
Regards
Brenda xx
Post a Comment