Unlike many other spanking sites and blogs I have never put up any statement to the effect that I do not condone the corporal punishment of minors, To be honest I have mixed views, especially in respect of school corporal punishment, although the chances of it ever returning in the UK must be very slight anyway.
However I do disapprove strongly of anyone using corporal punishment on a minor (or anyone else without their consent) for the purposes of sexual gratification, This image is brilliant in showing three modern style schoolgirls who would appear to be in serious trouble and perhaps deserving of corporal punishment. The problem it raises for me is that if I was their headteacher and corporal punishment was permitted and justified, I might find it hard to treat them all equally. One of them in particular - I suspect - would suffer a good deal more force behind the six strokes of the cane.
However I do disapprove strongly of anyone using corporal punishment on a minor (or anyone else without their consent) for the purposes of sexual gratification, This image is brilliant in showing three modern style schoolgirls who would appear to be in serious trouble and perhaps deserving of corporal punishment. The problem it raises for me is that if I was their headteacher and corporal punishment was permitted and justified, I might find it hard to treat them all equally. One of them in particular - I suspect - would suffer a good deal more force behind the six strokes of the cane.
4 comments:
So pleased you haven't reiterated the usual "I naturally disapprove of the corporal punishment of minors" line though I am none too sure about all teachers having that power as they did when I was a boy. Some did abuse the power although not necessarily for sexual reasons but simply the inability to keep good order any other way. To be fair to modern kids all of the schools bar one near me have a skirts rule for girls and 95% of the girls wlaking home or waiting for buses look perfectly decent respectable girls to me (even if their skirts are soemtimes a tad too short).However, the miss with the make-up, hairddo and hands on hip would be my prime candidate for a damn good caning. Old Tom
The 'girl' on the left and the one in the middle look as if they've been here before but the one on the right looks a bit worried.
Obviously wondering what it will feel like to be bent over the headmaster's desk and having her skirt flipped up in preparation for six of the best over the seat of her pants.
Poor thing. I woonder what she did to deserve this. Was she 'led on' by the other two maybe?
Beware the innocent look it belies a scheming mind. Th emis son teh right will deserve whatever she gets. Old Tom
A letter home to parents means bare, red bottoms ?!
Back in the good Ol' days of our generation James, 1950s-1980s, a letter home to strict, normal British parents, was all that gotten required: and would see these girls having their school skirts hoisted, their knickers pulled down & their bare, white botties skelped good scarlet with the cane or traditional, British plimsoll by their stern papas or moms!
"I will leather her bare backside and she will not sit down for a week!" said her father.
Oh my! I sure approve of that approach, James. It was normal admonishment in an age devoid of wishy-washy nonsense. And that is exactly how I gotten raised myself.
I was born in 1959 & experienced a stern 1950s religious upbringing in Georgia USA (AKA a normal, common, happy childhood) and my mother frequently said to my sister & me:
"spankings are as normal as bath times...and both involve your bare bottoms"
GULP!
I never questioned it, James, bare botty whippings were necessary & routine. As a young girl, I used to call spankings our "daily bread" when discussing family life with my buddies at church, school, Bible class, cheerleading practice etc. Spankings were not actually "daily", ha-ha! But my hint of gallows humour belied the Spartan, forlorn reality of growing up in the Christian South in the early 1960s. Naturally, all the church folk & Ministers were staunch advocates of our well-smacked, precocious princess bottoms "spare the rod spoil the child", already!
Why yes, James, a letter home to parents guaranteed a whooping. Corporal punishment at school for y'all was minor compared to normal, harsh whoopings at home for everyone! In fact, sister & me never gotten spanked at school. We were so goody two-shoes, because the consequences of a whipping at home were scary & harsh. Corporal punishment at home was severe but utterly harmless. And indeed was most necessary for sure. Mom fetched the flexible, rattan cane, she pulled our 1950s, canvas shorts & our 1950s, cotton, white panties down to our knees & tanned our pudgy, bare, lily white botties real red-sore "in front of God". We gotten 12 hard strokes, always on sensitive, bare hiney skin. Then we gotten sent to our bedrooms crying like babies. That was the punishment. Period.
The cane on bare buttocks at home is salutary & appropriate. And indeed that is how I punished my own two daughters from a young age in the 1980s. The cane was handy in the cupboard. Bare, sore botties ensured that good family manners, protocols, peace & calm prevailed, James! I believed in strict, loving rules & admonishments for lies, tantrums & brattitude etc. My two girls, now in their mid/late 30s, are the strongest proponents of spankings for their Christian faith, family values & practice, AKA we are just a normal Southern family in 2021.
Oh my! A letter home from school for these three girls above ensures that justice is served with the rod of correction on the orthodox place provided by the Lord !
Thanks a bunch, James.
Ol' Fashioned Brenda xx
Post a Comment