I loved the classic school uniforms in this - the girl at the back in the white blouse appeared in quite a few pictures around that era but the girl at the front I don't recall seeing again. Apart from her having rather bizarrely removed her shoes she looks totally credible and very attractive - clearly a maturing young lady, mortified to be facing a sound caning for her misdemeanours - the look of shock and resignation on her face is priceless. If I was the headmaster charged with teaching her a lesson I'm pretty sure she'd have had a few sharp smacks across the backs of her legs first.
Thursday, 18 March 2010
March Favourite
This month I've picked my favourite from the cover of a JANUS magazine from some years ago. This was issue 8 of the current number series.
I loved the classic school uniforms in this - the girl at the back in the white blouse appeared in quite a few pictures around that era but the girl at the front I don't recall seeing again. Apart from her having rather bizarrely removed her shoes she looks totally credible and very attractive - clearly a maturing young lady, mortified to be facing a sound caning for her misdemeanours - the look of shock and resignation on her face is priceless. If I was the headmaster charged with teaching her a lesson I'm pretty sure she'd have had a few sharp smacks across the backs of her legs first.
I loved the classic school uniforms in this - the girl at the back in the white blouse appeared in quite a few pictures around that era but the girl at the front I don't recall seeing again. Apart from her having rather bizarrely removed her shoes she looks totally credible and very attractive - clearly a maturing young lady, mortified to be facing a sound caning for her misdemeanours - the look of shock and resignation on her face is priceless. If I was the headmaster charged with teaching her a lesson I'm pretty sure she'd have had a few sharp smacks across the backs of her legs first.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Smacking legs, hands and bottoms.
I vividly remember seeing my girlfriends in the 1960s, having their bare legs slapped by their moms in the park, with their summer dresses or shorts providing access to bare skin. It was a smarting stingy warning shot - any further bad antics or tantrums would see their panties coming down to their pudgy knees, & their alabaster-white botties spanked bare to scarlet. That was the protocol at garden parties, park gathering for shopping mall misbehaviour.
I never really gotten my legs smacked in public. This is because my mother (very senior in our local suburban church) preferred to spank us not in public, but in private at home. And then it was always on our bare backsides with our knickers appropriately pulled down. Mother always used a rattan cane too, which with our botties bare, caused far more discomfort than a smacking in the park on our legs !! Oh my!
Having my pants pulled down & my bare botty whipped with the cane (from age 7) & a wooden spoon/hairbrush over mom/pop's knee, in my earlier years, was very traumatic, but also totally harmless. It was necessary chastisement. It made perfect sense to me as a child to have my bottom bared & made to sting like Hell. I expected this harsh, salutary punishment when I was naughty, & I sure loved my mother & father no less for their loving, Spartan Christian discipline with the rod - "spare the rod spoil the child", for sure.
Oh my! I was always mesmerized (if a lil' scared) to see my sister having her squishy-white backside bared for a good whooping with the flexible stick. It was just normal. She had a penchant for lying & mother knew had to deal with it. I gotten whipped more for my feisty attitude: I was not prone to lying. And I agreed from a young age that corporal punishment was good n necessary in our lives. Y'all daughters gotten spanked in y'all homes back in the 1960s. So in fact, millions of daughters & mothers in the South & in America as a whole, gotten to agree with me, James!! The wokerati would have y'all believe differently, of course.
The appliance of science on bare bottoms at home -
In the 1960s my mother said to sister & me that caning our hands was cruel & barbaric, but caning our bare bums was kind & remedial in front of God. Tanning our bare botties was perfectly safe (if painful!!). Tanning bare hands was not safe. Yup! Applying the cane to our legs was also cruel & it never happened. I totally agreed with mom as a child, although this might seem strange to admit, already. Later in the 1980s, I raised my own two daughters with CP when needed. I sure would never cane their hands or legs - I think it is cruel & dangerous as my mom said. But yes, they gotten their tender behinds tanned with the cane a good'un from a young age, and I always pulled down their panties so that they would feel the sting on a bare surface, from the get-go. That is how it should be done. There is also some important humbling about having their knicks pulled down & bottoms bared in front of God. And in front of their cross mother!! I never thought any different about CP, James.
All swell! I have no wishy-washy tendencies!! That is how it should be done & the cane upon their well-padded, sensitive-skinned bare buttocks was fierce but totally harmless James, ("tough love" , if you will) as I know from my great experience as a spankee daughter & a an Ol' fashioned spanker mom!
My girls are now in their 30s ( I am 62) & they are stanchly pro-CP. No surprise that, like their mother, they support smacking bare bottoms at home & not legs or hands ! That is simply the culture & philosophy of Southern culture & families James, coupled with an overlay of Christian chastisement totems. Indeed, the differences between America & UK/Europe fascinate me no end , already.
Thanks a bunch
Strict, no-nonsense Brenda xx
Post a Comment