Guide to this blog

The Blogroll is now in three parts. The main part is arranged according to the date the blog was last updated with the most recent first. Many blogs use the BDSMLR platform which does not include date information; they are in a separate Blogroll arranged alphabetically but I check from time to time and remove any that have been permanently closed. The final part is a list of interesting Twitter feeds - again in alphabetical order.

Wednesday, 1 January 2020

Favourite for January

HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYONE!

Let's kick off the new decade with this one...
I've said before that, with spanking videos and photoshoots, I like to see the misbehaviour that lead to the punishment and not just the punishment itself.  Sometimes, even just seeing the misbehaviour is quite exciting because then you get to write your own story and decide a suitable fate for the miscreants.  I have no idea of the source of this image or original story behind it, but in my mind it's a group of senior girls from school who are on some sort of educational trip, staying in a hostel somewhere, and they've decided to sneak down to the basement one night, strip off, and get up to some shenanigans  Only, they've been caught by the headmistress and are now in big, big trouble.

Do you have any thought about suitable punishments? Would the headmistress have actually taken a cane on the trip or not expected to need it?  If the doesn't have it with her, is she going to make them wait until they get back to school or is she going to deal with it here and now while they are, of their own volition, rather more vulnerable?  Perhaps in the present state of undress, a good hard slippering would suffice.

If she needs a hand, I'd be more than happy to assist - especially with the one on the left of the picture...

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Happy New Year, James :-)
Best wishes for 2020 & for your awesome blog.
Happy New Year, Old Tom & HNY y'all !

Yes, James, I guess the familiar sound of a nasty, thin, flexible cane smacking against the fairy-sensitive skin of bare princess botties, is the usual story plot for me !
Not because I construct a creative narrative, already - far from it. It is because it was the certain sound & feel of my own strict upbringing. Oh my ! CP for me was not at school (although the school sure administered it!) but I gotten it a bunch at home. So yes, for sure, as a harmless & salutary chastisement; I naturally recommend it right here, right now!

Although in reality James, would the rattan spanky-stick or leather strap be taken on a residential trip?
Oh my ! Again, from my own rueful experience (holiday spankings!!), wooden spoons & hairbrushes were often more ready at hand for appropriate tickle-tail on duly bared, cotton-soft backsides, in spontaneous, authoritative fashion. Right here, right now, young lady!
Brenda xx

SPANKEDHORTIC II said...

Almost everyone has a belt with them, when they travel :) Happy New Year.

Prefectdt

Anonymous said...

Tut Tut Tut. I regret that such very naughty behaviour must result in a serious punishment. Do you agree girl?
Old Tom
PS It doesn't matter whether they agree or not!

Anonymous said...

Only their buttocks should be bare for punishment. So dress them with dignity first, and then yes, it's 3 pairs of knickers pulled down to cane their bare backsides !

Naughty girls should be humbled but never humiliated when they gotten their bottoms smacked, James. Oh my! This was my strict, religious mother's mantra, & pray, my own strong belief too. This is the Southern Church tradition of "spanking with love" & "tough love" for discipline at home, which is immortalised in the classic, iconic, 1950s spanking narrative for naughty daughters. I was raised with this strict narrative....and moreover, its stinging physical manifestation on my bare buttocks as a young girl growing up in the 1960s & 70s.

Mother taught me that a spanking is humbling but never humiliating. We were never spanked naked, because as mom said, it was unnecessary and humiliating.
However we always gotten the cane on our bare, soft-skinned botties over all the years. The sting was unbearably ferocious, naturally, (the "hornets nest" we called it, already) but it was completely harmless. And indeed fair, appropriate and necessary, God darn it ! YUP! Princess brats need proper CP in my book !!! No bottoms gotten harmed in the raising of two daughters, James.

So mom said yes, our panties should always be pulled down (to our knees only, never removed) but other clothes should remain in-situ. Only our buttocks needed to be bare for punishment, nothing else. Removing socks & tops was futile, humiliating & unnecessary. I totally agree James. When my own two daughters gotten the cane from me (1980s/90s) it was thus dress up & panties down only. Chubby, white botties denuded & on show for punishment always (in a practical, humbling fashion), but all other clothes remaining with dignity in-situ.

Indeed, when young mothers at Church now ask me about their young daughters & sensible Christian "don't spare the rod" chastisements.....my advice is always "cane to bare botty" (as you know) but with love & humbling, & with panties lowered just-so for the lil' stingy, corrective rattan rod. .
Moreover, with my 66 year-old strict, trad, Southern grandma hat on, & cane in hand....as a prime exemplar for younger moms - your two superlative photos on two of your posts - Tuesday, 30 September 2014, favourite for October and Thursday, 1 June 2017, favourite for June - provide the most perfect, candid & visceral "guidance notes" for how these long suffering moms should now proceed with their naughty daughters, James !!!!! Oh my!

That said, James, to this post of three naughty naked girls above: pray, they should first be fully dressed with dignity restored. And yes, then their dresses can be lifted & their knicks pulled down to knees, so that the cane cane whistle freely across the soft skin of their botties by way of just desserts & redemption. Cane on the bare, to show we care, James. That is the punishment required.

Oh my! Did I mention the STING, James ? But crucially, a smacked bottom is about humbling, not humiliation. Sometimes such a crucial, essential fact was sadly lacking in some of the (slightly bizarre) Readers Letters & articles in Janes & Roue in the 1970s & early 80s. But the Janus editors sure had good intentions & practical thinking and were so pastorally & parentally right when they said that naughty daughters should get "a sensible knickers down caning" at home when needed after bad behaviour (eg Editorial, Janus Volume 8 number 12). Sure thing, James. That is the punishment CP good. PC bad.
Kind regards & thanks, James
Brenda xx