Why do people edit out the name of people and companies producing spanko images and thus deny them advertising? Most bloggers freely use images that someone else has paid money and spent their time to produce, and in many cases the subject of the image has also endured some discomfort in that production. If I use an image taken directly from a producer I try to ensure I only use images that they have given away for free as a sample of their work - that doesn't seem unreasonable as it may drive viewers to look at their site and very occasionally may actually generate income for them. Of course, if they were to request me to remove one of their images I would still do so (although I've never had such a request yet). If I use an image which doesn't have the name of the producer on it but I know who the producer is, I try to give credit. But what do people gain from taking an image bearing the producers name and edit it to try to remove that name? It doesn't mean you're not infringing their copyright - just depriving them of recognition for the work that went into producing it. The only time I ever edit out a name on an image is when I know someone is claiming credit for someone else's work - perhaps after cropping the image to hide the name of the actual producer.
Some cases of name editing are also, spectacularly bad!
A very badly edited image from Punished Brats
Some cases of name editing are also, spectacularly bad!
A very badly edited image from Punished Brats
An attempt to crop out the name but didn't quite managed to remove the top of the capital S from Dreams of Spanking - and even without that error, the face and bottom are fairly easy to identify (perhaps it's the bottom that needs cropping rather than the image...).
Another great image - I wonder where it came from? Oh look, bottom right corner - looks as if it's from Punished Brats again!
It's not surprising that some producers have taken to putting their credits right across the middle of the image but it's a shame we have to see it spoiled like that.
2 comments:
It is a privilege of age to be grumpy but this is something worthy of grumpiness.
Old Tom
Did the panties misbehave James, photo 2 ?
I so love these 3 scenes which take me back to raising my 2 daughters with corporal punishment in the 1980s & 90s. The photos are an accurate reflection & a hairbrush to the bare botty (photo 1) was the standard punishment in their early years.
The third photo also shows a strict super-hero mom telling her daughter to "go to your room at once, young lady !" after a good tanning on a bare "seat of learning." I strongly approve
But the middle photo is so powerful for me. Oh my !
James, my two daughters will verify that their panties (sadly !) did not misbehave....never !
I was a strict, conservative, Southern mother, raised myself in a traditional, Christian family in 1960s Georgia.
So yes, I fetched the botty smacker (rattan cane) for my young girls when they told lies or gotten naughty: up came their dresses or down came their shorts & I gotten faced with a pair of white, cotton panties clothing a chubby bum. My girls wore conservative, sensible clothes from the store. Was I gonna whoop frustratingly through those clothes ? No way Jose.
So for sure I always pulled their knickers down to their knees & chastised them on their bare backsides. No compromise required. Did they deserve protective coverings ?
So they gotten it harsh but fair, exactly like I gotten as a child. Yes, cane to the bare botty is terribly effective, safe & harmless. Oh my ! Just the ticket. Smacking hard on sensitive, bare skin, is the only way a spanking should be given. It did me good growing up.
My girls are now in their 30s. They thank me & are pro-spanking to the core. As a family, we all have these conversations reflecting on our nostalgia & childhoods...typical of Southern families. Thank The Lord, now at age 60, I always gotten to be free from wishy-washy PC nonsense, James, back in the day. Both as a mother & as a lil' Southern Belle.
Regards.
Brenda xx
Post a Comment